Quite the evening, board members joining from their cars while driving, our case delayed until sufficient board members were attending, then a dramatic finish where the proposed development was denied by a 6 to 1 majority. However, after a closed session was called, the meeting resumed. Because the developer’s attorney was not given the chance to make his closing remarks the decision was declared void.This resulted in a new proposal for a two-family home which was ultimately approved without the local residents being allowed to speak.
Perhaps this was the game plan from the beginning, it was truly a window into how local Newark policies are decided. At best the efforts of the community to get their voice heard resulted in a two family home instead of a four family.It was sad to se that the system allowed the developer to propose updated plans and documents without them being made available to the public.
We look forward to viewing the archived video of the meeting when it is published. We also wonder what was finally approved since there are no plans for the proposed two family unit. Perhaps they will provide parking?
We did get a fair response from the local community: A total of 38 locals participated and made their voice heard. Only one of those was in support of the development.
The parking survey showed that over a ten-day period there were no empty spots along the streets boarding the development and that most night the semi-legal and illegal spots were often taken. This s a change from ten years ago when the same informal study was undertaken. Back then there were typically 2-3 spots open during the week with only occasional days where all spots were filled.
We wonder how new developments like this will continue to affect local parking and the safe navigation of the busy N 6th Street.
Finally, a thanks to all those who got involved, I hope we can continue to see your involvement in our local community.
Leave a Reply